Evidence of torture download page

The government decision Ju2022/02354 on December 1, 2022 prevents prosecutors from conducting a criminal investigation into the Chancellor of Justice's involvement in the Swedish state's breach of the rule of law, as evidenced by the verdict in case no. T3106-18 at Borås District Court, stemming from state threats with a weapon showcased in the courtroom. The Grave Concern of Systematic Torture in Sweden.

Throughout nearly a decade of legal proceedings, the torture victims confronted threats involving automatic weapons, as noted in official court documents. During the core stages of the trial, the victim, together with his family and legal counsel, were menaced with threats of being shot by a Kalashnikov within the courtroom premises. Far from being empty threats, these state-communicated intimidation's materialized when, amidst the ongoing legal process, the perpetrator invaded the family's private residence, executing a knife attack that deeply traumatized the family, including their young children. These threats were communicated to the victim's attorney. Video presentation No. 2 cover a detailed testimony from the main trial about this chain of events. However, the verdict doesn't explicitly reflect the witness's statements due to the court's concealment of the weapon threats.

The judgment in case no. T3106-18 in Borås District court glaringly omits reflections of the witnesses' accounts, indicating that the court intentionally overlooked the threats. This intentional act by Borås District court judge and Chancellor of Justice actions is a conscious and planned violation of the rule of law.

The Swedish state's violation of the rule of law through the verdict in case no. T3106-18 at Borås District Court due to State threats with weapon presented in courtroom.

In legal proceedings that spanned nearly a decade, the victim of torture faced threats involving automatic weapon, as recorded in court documents. During the main proceedings of the trial, the victim and their family were threatened with being shot with a Kalashnikov in the courtroom. The verdict doesn't fully capture the witness's statements because of the court's suppression of the threats, which are detailed on page 11 of the judgement. For a comprehensive analysis of why the judgement intentionally violates the rule of law, please scroll down and read our Analysis. For a comprehensive analysis of the verdict's content and context, you can pose specific questions using the free and easily accessable online PDF analysis AI-tool available at https://copula.ai/

Video presentation No. 2 cover a detailed testimony recorded from the main trial about weapon threats
Video presentation No. 3 cover how victim, his family and his attorney received automatic weapon threats
Video presentation No. 4 cover a detailed narrative of the chain of events link criminals to government officials

The PDF file contains an English translation of the verdict, and within the same file, there is also the original Swedish version of the verdict.

A verbatim transcript is available where The Tax Authority official testifies in court regarding state-sanctioned threats with weapons and extortion.

During the testimony, Mr. Rivinoja conducts an interrogation with witness Heidar Hilmarsson. He inquires about an incident where Heidar Hilmarsson and Sylva Bonander interviewed a criminal suspect named Kjell Ekblad. In this interview, Ekblad gravely threatened to shoot Mr. Rivinoja and his family using a Kalashnikov. These threats were particularly alarming as Ekblad was armed at the time of the interrogation, and the police contacted due to these events. Video Presentation No. 3 reenacts the events where Kjell Ekblad is armed with weapon during meetings with officials from the criminal investigative authority, witnessed by the Tax Agency's Section Chief, Heidar Hilmarsson detailed in Video Presentation No. 2. In such extortion scenarios, state representatives record threats in court protocols and relay this information to Mr. Rivinoja´s via his legal counsel. The judge and the Chancellor of Justice, present during the trial, overlook the witness's statements with negligent intent due to the court's suppression of the automatic threats. These threats have been consistently documented in court records for almost ten years, as detailed on page 11 of the judgement. This results in a breach of the rule of law through the verdict in case no. T3106-18 at Borås District Court.

Family and Children Threatened and Assaulted with Knife in Private Home: Serious Abuses of Legal Processes in Borås District Court Cases B310-12 and T3106-18 with Involvement of Investigative Authorities in the Abuses.

The crime of "Judicial Misconduct" has been reported to the police following a knife attack that occurred during an ongoing legal process, case no. B310-12 at Borås District Court. The responsible prosecutor, Ove Jäverfelt, was involved in this case. The perpetrator, captured in photographs during the knife assault on Mr. Rivinoja, is under investigation in another victim's inventory of stolen items. Consequently, the threats and intimidation persist in real-time. Notably, the assailant hasn't been prosecuted because, in this context, stolen goods aren't considered living entities, and the crime can't be legally prosecuted as the perpetrator has been dehumanized to the status of mere property. The same prosecutor initiated the charges against Mr. Rivinoja, during which he and his family were threatened with automatic weapons. These state-sanctioned legal transgressions are referenced in the Government case no. Ju2022/02354 as appendix no. 7.

The identical case is also included in the Parliament's case no. 2581-2022/23 which provides an account of the knife attacks on appendix 5, page 142. This was submitted to the court under case no. T3106-18 as annex no. 92 on June 5, 2020, summarized as follows:
The plaintiff has been compelled to highlight to the court that during the legal process, there has been a violation of legal rights, where the plaintiff's legal security and justice have been disregarded due to an incorrect exercise of authority involving abuse of power. This state-sanctioned abuse aims to unlawfully influence and limit the plaintiff's procedural capacity, preventing the plaintiff from submitting relevant information, investigative actions, and available evidence. After careful consideration, the plaintiff has chosen to present this account to the court, detailing the state's abuse that jeopardizes legal security and justice. This is especially concerning given the severe threats from individuals capable of violence, as documented in police investigation with reference no. 5000-K511014-11 annex 7, pages 52-56. The undue influence in the legal process has compromised the plaintiff's right to a fair trial. Due to threats of violence, the plaintiff has been hesitant to disclose crucial details and evidence, creating an imbalance favoring one party. It's the state's responsibility to rectify the damages that have arisen. The crime of "overreach in legal proceedings" is complex, as the action can appear as a different crime if the context isn't fully understood. This issue has significantly escalated the plaintiff's legal costs, as concerns about personal safety in a reported crime have overshadowed the legal process. The plaintiff has also had to bear the costs of maintaining personal safety, including bodyguard protection. These circumstances are also corroborated by the evidence compiled by the prosecutor in the supplementary preliminary investigation conducted in 2015. The ongoing legal process in case no. T3106-18 does not meet the necessary standards of legal security. It's the state's duty to protect its citizens from legal abuses, both from individual entities and its operations. Therefore, fundamental principles must be upheld to ensure individual legal security in all criminal investigations conducted by prosecutors and the police. A legal issue has arisen in the context of case no. T3106-18. When a claim is brought to court alleging a violation of convention rights, the state has an obligation to immediately cease ongoing violations of these rights. The state also has a duty to provide national remedies resulting from its breaches of convention rights. Currently, there's uncertainty regarding this legal relationship between the parties concerning the state's violation of Ale Rivinoja's convention rights.

The state's retaliation, far from being an empty threat, manifested with chilling immediacy, highlighting the severe nature of threats where even children weren't spared from state-sanctioned violence and knife attacks. Just 11 days later, on June 16, 2020, coinciding with the district court's dispatch to the Chancellor of Justice, Rivinoja's home was the site of a harrowing knife assault. Every family member, including the children, faced threats and direct violence. It's documented that the traumatized children are now terrified of waking up in the middle of the night, fearing another knife attack. This distressing incident is thoroughly chronicled in a police report with reference no. 5000-K716191-20 and is also cited in the Parliament's case no. 2581-2022/23, appendix no. 7. For the sake of safety, the children's personal details have been redacted. Notably, Investigating Officer Peter Ström, previously involved in an earlier assault investigation (reference no. 5000-K511014-11), played a significant role in this case, leading to the police's engagement with social services. A detailed account is provided in the Government case no. Ju2022/02354, appendix no. 7, which can be accessed through the PDF link above. The document also offers an English summary of the events.

For a comprehensive analysis of the investigation authorities manipulation of crime investigation with methods and context, you can pose specific questions using the free and easily accessable online AI-tool for PDF analysis available at https://copula.ai/

Analysis of the judgement in case no. T3106-18

Click here for an brief analysis of the judgement in case no. T3106-18 in Borås District Court.

Background and Parties Involved:
The case was heard in the Borås District Court in Sweden.
The plaintiff in the case was Mr Rivinoja, and the defendant was the State, represented by the Chancellor of Justice.

Initial Charges and Developments:
Mr. Rivinoja faced serious accounting violations or tax control crime charges in 2013 related to case B310-12. These accusations were subsequently dropped by the prosecutor in 2016 and 2017, clearing Mr. Rivinoja's name. Throughout the legal process, he and his defense attorney, Sandra Ullsten, encountered threats involving automatic firearms, documented in court protocols since 2011. Such threats equate to acts of torture. The state's efforts to coerce a confession from Mr. Rivinoja for a crime he was innocent of, using these weapon threats, are deeply concerning for Sweden's rule of law and judicial integrity. In 2018, Mr. Rivinoja pursued legal action against chamber prosecutor Jonathan Meyer, seeking his conviction for false prosecution and state compensation for damages. While parts of his claim were rejected, the ongoing case T3106-18 addresses the remaining issues. In this context, the Chancellor of Justice denied responsibility for the state's documented automatic weapon threats aimed at Mr. Rivinoja and his family. The same threats were also directed at Mr. Rivinoja´s lawyer in written court protocols, where the witness Heidar Hilmarsson confirmed the accuracy of the sequence of events with his detailed testimony. This scenario underscores the Swedish state's breach of the rule of law, evident in the November 2020 verdict of case no. T3106-18 at Borås District Court, where state-sanctioned automatic weapon threats persisted in the courtroom for nearly ten years.

Claims and Allegations:
Mr Rivinoja claimed that the charges against him were either false or at least unjustified. He alleged that the authorities manipulated pre-trial records, distorted evidence, and violated his rights under Article 6 of the European Convention.
He adjusted his claim for damages multiple times, with the final amount being SEK 18,193,102. This amount included compensation for his own work, time wasted, expert opinion costs, lawyer fees, and compensation for violations.

State's Defense:
The State dismissed Mr. Rivinoja's claims, asserting there was no false or unjustified prosecution. The Chancellor of Justice also refuted any mistakes, oversights, or violations of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) or that any criminal activities resulted in any harm or infringements against Mr. Rivinoja. The State argued that Mr. Rivinoja was properly informed about the accusations against him, had ample time and resources to prepare his defense, and that all crucial documents were submitted to the court during the previous legal process that lasted 6.5 years. It's crucial to emphasize that the state denied any responsibility for the harm and illicit actions resulting from the automatic weapon threats directed at Mr. Rivinoja, his family, and his attorney. The state's attempt to conceal the systematic extortion of 2.4 million SEK against Mr. Rivinoja's company served as written evidence in the case. Heidar Hilmarsson's testimony reported the involvement and participation of state actors in legal abuses and extortion crimes that unfolded during the main hearing of the case and throughout all the legal proceedings.

Judgement:
The Borås District Court dismissed Mr Rivinoja's action. Mr Rivinoja was ordered to reimburse the state for legal costs amounting to SEK 208,757, with interest from the date of the judgment until payment is made.

Conclusion:
In the legal dispute between Mr Rivinoja and the State, the State emerged as the prevailing party.
Mr. Rivinoja's claims were rejected, and he was held responsible for the legal costs associated with the case, amounting to SEK 208,757 as stipulated in the judgment. This unfolded in a scenario where Mr. Rivinoja and his family faced threats involving automatic weapons during the court proceedings, and the victims also endured a knife attack at their home, constituting a legal assault. As emphasized by the testimony of witness Heidar Hilmarsson, these threats occurred in front of both the presiding judge and the Chancellor of Justice, representing the Swedish state. In this context, both the negligent intent and the deliberate orchestration of the crime and torture led to a breach of the rule of law.

Judgement Restrictions and Rule of Law: Analyzing Hilmarsson's Testimony on Automatic Weapon Threats.

Court's Judgement and Implications

As stated on pages 2-3 of the judgement, the court made a pivotal decision to restrict damage claims for events prior to December 12, 2013. This decision considerably limits Mr. Rivinoja's recourse regarding threats, particularly those involving automatic weapons, directed at him, his family, and his attorney by the extortionist, Kjell Ekblad. Disturbingly, these threats, diligently recorded in court protocols, appear to have silent acquiescence from state apparatuses, hinting at potential state-sponsored aggression.

Legal Framework and Involvement

The principle "State-mediated threats in trial protocols of serious nature aren't civil law concerns" underscores a pivot: from perceiving this as a mere civil disagreement to potential criminal transgressions and human rights infractions.

In Swedish jurisprudence, the Chancellor of Justice holds a unique prosecutorial role, bearing an unambiguous mandate to act on verifiable crimes. Threats involving automatic weapons would ostensibly qualify. Yet, by neglecting this duty, the Chancellor of Justice might be indirectly facilitating acts that, in their intensity, verge on constituting torture for people like Mr. Rivinoja and his family. Further deepening the gravity are the repeated knife attacks during legal procedures. Notably, evidence from the trial intimates involvement of state actors from the criminal investigation authority. Despite these connections, police and prosecutor actions have seemingly prevented thorough investigations, emphasizing threats even to legal personnel, thereby questioning the very bedrock of Sweden's rule of law.

Witness Testimony and Evidence

Heidar Hilmarsson, the section chief of the Swedish Tax Agency, delivered pivotal testimony concerning these threats, as documented on page 29 of the judgement. Video presentation No. 2, an audio recording of the primary court hearing, underscores Hilmarsson's statements, especially the instances when Mr. Rivinoja and his family were threatened with automatic weapons amidst a documented extortion scheme involving actual firearms.

Hilmarsson's testimony aligns with records from state officials dated March 9, 2011. These records were relayed to attorney Sandra Ullsten on May 15, 2012. Later, Rivinoja's legal team from Law Firm Aldo presented this evidence in Appendix No. 1 on July 2, 2019, for case no. T3106-18, which is also referenced in case file appendix no. 42.

Threats Against Lawyers and Retaliation Through Knife Attacks in Victim's Private Home

Significantly, Law Firm Aldo withdrew its mandate due to concerns of reprisals, particularly because these threats extended to legal professionals. This decision was catalyzed by a harrowing knife attack at the Rivinojas' private residence on the night of June 16, 2020, which had a profound impact on the family throughout the ongoing trial process. Consequently, Mr. Rivinoja found himself navigating his courtroom representation, despite already having paid the law firm 573,325 SEK in legal costs. Shockingly, during the main case hearing, he was confronted with threats involving automatic weapons within the courtroom. Remarkably, in response to enduring such threats, the outcome was a judgement obliging the targeted individual to cover Justice Chancellor's legal expenses, totaling 208,757 SEK.

This scenario amounts to torture for the threatened individual in the courtroom, compelling them to pay over 800,000 SEK for the distress of facing automatic weapon threats within the courtroom.

Conclusion

Rule of Law and Human Rights: The judiciary's oversight or minimization of such significant threats implies potential infringements of foundational democratic principles and human rights.

Judicial Independence: The court's approach towards these threats warrants introspection about its independence and neutrality.

Civil vs. Criminal: Given their magnitude, such threats necessitate a criminal lens over a civil one.

On which pages of the judgment in case no. T3106-18 in Borås District Court are Kjell's weapon threats mentioned and where in the video presentation are these events documented?

In the judgement, it's noted that Kjell Ekblad, who faced charges related to bookkeeping offenses, posed a threat to Mr Rivinoja. It's indicated that during a hearing at the Tax Agency's office in Ulricehamn, where Ekblad was being questioned, he brought a firearm. Prosecutor Ove Jäverfelt reportedly cautioned about keeping the interrogation brief due to Ekblad's perceived danger. This suggests concerns about the potential use of the weapon during the hearing. Additionally, the judgement reveals that as a response to the threat, Mr Rivinoja had to hire bodyguards for his safety.

The judgement specifically details that Kjell Ekblad, who was facing charges related to bookkeeping offenses, threatened Mr. Rivinoja and his family with an automatic weapon, a Kalashnikov. This threat became evident when Ekblad arrived at a hearing at the Tax Agency's office in Ulricehamn while he was under questioning.
This action provoked profound concerns, as state actors seemingly encouraged Kjell Ekblad to perpetrate serious crimes or partake in legal violations against Mr. Rivinoja and his family.

This information is detailed on page 11 of the judgement.

Video Presentation No. 3 reenacts the events where Kjell Ekblad is armed during meetings with officials from the criminal investigative authority, witnessed by the Tax Agency's Section Chief, Heidar Hilmarsson. In such extortion scenarios, state representatives record threats in court protocols and relay this information to Mr. Rivinoja´s legal counsel.

Video Presentation No. 2 an audio recording of the primary court hearing, reinforces Hilmarsson's statements, particularly highlighting moments when Mr. Rivinoja and his family faced threats involving automatic weapons within a documented extortion scheme that included real firearms. These occurrences are corroborated by the testimony of Heidar Hilmarsson, the section chief of the Swedish Tax Agency, as documented on page 29 of the judgement.

What does the judgement mention about investigation authorities intentionally manipulating evidence in crime investigations?

In the judgement, there are allegations suggesting evidence manipulation in the crime investigations against Mr Rivinoja. Rivinoja contends that evidence during the preliminary investigation was tampered with and manipulated. He points to varying versions of interrogations as evidence of distortion. Further, Rivinoja claims that, during his searches of the police system, he was unable to locate these interrogations, reinforcing his belief that evidence was distorted throughout the preliminary investigation. Such allegations of evidence manipulation are grave and form a significant part of Rivinoja's argument against what he perceives as false and unjust prosecution. It remains unclear from the judgment whether these claims of evidence manipulation were conclusively proven or addressed during the case.

What type of evidence has Mr. Rivinoja submitted to court when alleging that investigative authorities have deliberately tampered with evidence in criminal probes, with the intent to facilitate legal abuses and obstruct inquiries into repeated knife attacks?

After the distressing knife assault on Mr. Rivinoja at his home on the night of June 16, 2020, which deeply traumatized the young children present, comprehensive evidence of the attack was submitted to the court on July 29, 2020, under case no. T3106-18. The episodes related to the repeated knife assaults, especially those unfolding amidst active legal proceedings, are detailed in case file appendices no. 103, 113, and 119. This evidence raises concerns, pointing to the involvement of both the police and the prosecutor in legal abuses during ongoing court proceedings. The attack on Mr. Rivinoja and his family is viewed as a severe breach of the legal framework and constitutes torture for the victims.

On October 9, 2020, as detailed in case file appendix no. 222 of case no. T3106-18, the district court allowed Mr. Rivinoja to present the specified incidents and the new documentary evidence. Unexpectedly, the civil trial began examining damages resulting from severe criminal activities that transpired both during and prior to the legal proceedings. This shift was emphasized by the written evidence provided to the court. The evidence that the court authorized for presentation based on its decision is enumerated below:

a) Mr Rivinoja suffered business damages stemming from robbery, systematic extortion, economic crimes, trademark infringements, and inaccurate discretionary tax assessments by the Tax Agency, leading to consequential damages.
b) The prosecutor and the Tax Agency deleted a digital accounting file.
c) The Tax Agency made erroneous taxation decisions and mishandled the payment assurance process.
d) Mr Rivinoja was not informed about the specific crime he was suspected of during the preliminary investigation that led to the charges, and he was not given ample time or opportunity to prepare his defense.
e) The prosecutor's decision to press charges was flawed, based on the prosecutor's knowledge of severe accounting violations in Lyson AB, which were pertinent to the suspicions against Mr Rivinoja.
f) The prosecutor introduced false preliminary investigation materials.
g) The prosecutor attempted to withhold evidence by not submitting the preliminary investigation protocol to the district court.
h) The prosecutor is accountable for delays in processing, essentially violating the right to a trial within a reasonable time frame.

As detailed on pages 2-3 of the judgement, the court decided to restrict damage claims for events prior to December 12, 2013, though evidence pertaining to those events was permitted for presentation in court.

Emerging from serious crimes and legal misconduct during the proceedings, a ruling in case no. T3106-18 at Borås District Court declares that claims rooted in such evidence are inadmissible due to the incidents taking place before December 12, 2013. This unfolding scenario hints at a possible collusion between the judge and the Chancellor of Justice, suggesting political intervention in determining the case's verdict. Accusations allude that the judge may have engaged in intentional acts of torture and violated the rule of law, particularly in light of the thorough details from Heidar Hilmarsson's testimony and the evidence introduced in the case.

Is it possible to verify the information on documents presented on the website to ensure its accuracy?

The accuracy of the information presented on this website can be verified through the principle of public access in Sweden. Documents from the government offices in case Ju2022/02354 are public records and can be requested by the general public. Court documents from Borås District Court case number T3106-18 are also public records and can be requested by the general public. These documents are compiled into PDF files which can be downloaded from this website as evidence for the claims presented. The Government Offices, specifically the Ministry of Justice, can be contacted for inquiries regarding of public documents, including files and journal sheets, in case Ju2022/02354 via email at justitiedepartementet.registrator@regeringskansliet.se

If you wish to request a public document from the Parliamentary Administration's registry, please contact the registrar. For questions regarding the parliament's documents in case no. 2581-2022/23, contact the Parliament Information Service via e-mail at registrator.riksdagsforvaltningen@riksdagen.se

For inquiries regarding public documents, including the verdict, case appendices, and journal sheets from case number B310-12 or case number T3106-18, one can reach out to the Borås District Court via email at boras.tingsratt@dom.se

Borås District Court can be reached via the contact details provided on their website, via below link
https://www.domstol.se/boras-tingsratt/

The Government Offices of Sweden can be reached via the contact details provided on their website, via below link
https://www.regeringen.se/kontaktuppgifter/kontaktuppgifter-till-departementens-registratorer/

The Swedish Riksdag, parliament can be reached via the contact details provided on their website, via below link
https://www.riksdagen.se/en/contact-and-visit/contact-the-riksdag/

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

What is the purpose of this website?

The information on this website primarily constitutes a report to international organizations combating money laundering, with a request for instant assistance as publishing information and methods for large-scale money laundering operations cause danger to life!
We're raising funds on gofundme to engage a human rights lawyer dedicated to addressing violations of international law in Sweden, especially those contravening jus cogens norms. Jus cogens, or "compelling law," represents a set of fundamental principles universally recognized and accepted in international law, from which no derogation is permitted. Violations of these principles, such as torture or genocide, are considered particularly egregious. This attorney will champion the rights of victims, ensure justice is upheld, and work tirelessly to end the ongoing suffering these victims endure. After all, it's a fundamental human right not to be subjected to state-sponsored torture.

Human rights defenders and human rights organizations are always welcome to examine our case and offer assistance in order to stop ongoing torture situation. Our contact information is stated further down on the website. Support our case in gofundme - https://gofund.me/ee8be8d1

Is it possible to verify the information on documents presented on the website to ensure its accuracy?

Is it possible to contact you and ask questions about the reported cases?

Contact details for the website's responsible publisher can be found at the bottom of the webpage. Journalists and human rights organizations are always warmly welcomed to contact me in either English or Swedish. It is crucial to bring international attention to the ongoing real-time torture in Sweden to ensure these heinous crimes are halted immediately.

What types of crimes in the legal processes have victims of torture been exposed to in Sweden?

In Sweden, victims of torture, particularly entrepreneurs, find themselves ensnared in a web of criminal activities, with disturbing indications of the state's judicial system's complicity or negligence. Here's a detailed overview:

1. Collusion with Organized Crime: The judicial system of the state exhibits alarming signs of cooperation with prominent organized crime syndicates. Entrepreneurs, notably, bear the brunt of this unholy alliance, consistently facing systematic extortion. This intimidation often comes with the added threat of armed assault or robbery. In this specific instance, illicit gains and money laundering activities amount to over 25 million US dollars. Such substantial criminal proceeds risk funding terrorist operations, flagrantly violating international anti-money laundering statutes.

2. Prosecutorial Misdirection: Rather than addressing and prosecuting the evident acts of extortion, the state's machinery turns its focus on the victims, with entrepreneurs frequently being charged with accounting malpractices.

3. Threats During Legal Proceedings: Extortionists openly and continually threaten victims during the legal proceedings. These threats, often backed by automatic weapons, have been documented in official court records.

4. Violence in the Courtroom: The threats faced by victims are not just of a psychological nature. Direct physical attacks, especially knife assaults, have transpired during legal proceedings, placing victims in immediate danger. When the state was sued in case number T3106-18 in Borås District Court, written evidence was presented showing that state actors from the police authority and the prosecutor's office were directly involved in these legal abuses. Despite this compelling evidence, the Chancellor of Justice denied responsibility for the harm in the court.

5. Need for Private Security: Given the escalating threats, entrepreneurs have been compelled to hire bodyguards for personal protection. Tragically, these bodyguards are not only subjected to grave danger, suffering lifelong injuries from severe assaults, but in two cases, they have faced fatal consequences. Despite reports being filed regarding the murder of these bodyguards, investigative authorities have consistently refused to take action.

6. Police och Prosecutor Inaction: As the primary safeguard against such threats, the police and prosecutor have intentionally shown a deeply concerning reluctance or inability to investigate and counter this extensive criminal activity. These circumstances were substantiated with written evidence in case number T3106-18 at the Borås District Court. There, police and prosecutors seem to collaborate with gang criminals by manipulating criminal investigations, leading to legal abuses against victims in the judicial processes.

7. State Denial of Responsibility: When victims seek legal redress against the state for the blatant violation of their rights, the state, typically through the Chancellor of Justice, denies responsibility.

8. Extended Legal Battles: Victims and their families aren't only grappling with current threats. They've been embroiled in these harrowing legal battles for almost a decade, with the danger never far away.

9. Assaults Outside the Courtroom: The violence isn't restricted to courtrooms or public spaces. In one chilling instance, a torture victim's family faced a knife assault within the confines of their home.

10. Enforced Disappearance and Kidnapping of Family Members: The depth of the state's threats is profoundly alarming, often materializing as extortion maneuvers carefully coordinated with major governmental actions, especially in the lead-up to the government's resolution on December 1, 2022. In a grim twist, social services, reportedly with involvement from security police, have exploited this hostile climate by kidnapping family members on November 15, 2022. Specifically, children of individuals who have been victims of torture have been targeted in what appears to be a retaliatory measure stemming from torture victims filing reports with social services over concerns of their children being at risk of torture. It's unbearably painful to realize that young children, already victims of harassment and threats, have faced violence and intimidation within the very walls meant to protect them during their formative years. This forced disappearance means that children in these impacted families are robbed of the justice and therapeutic care they direly need to address the trauma and wounds inflicted by torture.

11. Threats to Legal Representatives: The intimidation doesn't stop with the primary victims. The state's antagonistic approach also encompasses the legal representatives of the victims. Several attorneys have withdrawn from proceedings, citing concerns over their personal safety. Given that the Swedish government seems to harbor a political agenda where threatening lawyers with weapons is tolerated, it becomes imperative to seek human rights lawyers beyond Sweden's borders.

In conclusion, this disturbing scenario paints a grim portrait of the rule of law in Sweden, with victims of torture being subjected to a relentless onslaught of threats, legal challenges, and physical violence. The state apparatus, which should ideally be a bulwark against such abuses, appears to be either complicit or negligently indifferent.

How is Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer implicated in the enforced disappearance of a mother and children on November 15, 2022, related to the government's decision on December 1, 2022?

Direct Involvement of State Agents: The abduction was reportedly carried out by social services, which are state entities. Their involvement raises immediate concerns about the depth of government involvement or consent in this enforced disappearance.

Connection to High-Level Officials: Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer, responsible for the government's decision on December 1, 2022 in case Ju2022/02354, also oversees the security police which had interactions with the social services investigation concerning the disappearance. This link between high-ranking government officials and the entities directly associated with the disappearance intensifies concerns about potential government complicity.
Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer's decision implies that torture crimes directed against the family won't be investigated by prosecutors concerning the Chancellor of Justice's involvement and authority in such torture offenses.

Strategic Timing: The close timing of the disappearance to a significant governmental decision on December 1, 2022, cannot be overlooked. It suggests a possible strategic move related to this decision, further implicating state involvement.

Retaliatory Motive: On July 1, 2022, the father relayed his anxieties to social services regarding the potential torture risks posed to his children. The children's ensuing disappearance is increasingly seen as a direct and intense backlash to his actions, further amplifying speculations of state involvement or acquiescence. This tension is heightened by an incident in which the family was strong-armed into surrendering a vehicle under violent threats in their home, an event that was duly reported to the police on August 31, 2022. Adding to the complexity, the Swedish Security Service is implicated through their establishment of two reports of concern in the social services' investigation documents, where the father is pinpointed as the issue. The approach of social services throughout their investigation raises eyebrows.
The caseworker found it peculiar that the father did not seek out the extortionist. It's distressing that social services expect the father to approach a reported extortionist in an investigation related to a child welfare concern, as this would not be in the best interest of the children. What's even more baffling is the absence of any official report of concern by social services, despite the children being direct witnesses to violent extortion threats in their home, an incident that stands as a violation of child protection laws in Sweden. Their later disappearance appears to be a direct and severe retaliation for his actions, further suggesting possible state involvement or complicity.

Lack of Transparency and Accountability: The refusal to disclose information about the mother and children's whereabouts or condition, combined with the denial or obfuscation of the disappearance, indicates state complicity or at least an unwillingness to pursue justice.

Systemic Threats: The broader climate of fear, combined with the specific threats and extortion tactics tied to governmental actions, suggests that this enforced disappearance is part of a larger pattern of state-sponsored or state-tolerated human rights violations.

Inadequate Police Response: The police's reported lack of action or hesitancy, especially given the severity of the crime, either indicates systemic inefficiency, lack of interest, or deliberate neglect, implicating the state's role further.

Conclusion:
The provided evidence paints a concerning picture of state involvement or consent in the disappearance of the mother and children. The direct links between high-level officials like Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer and the entities involved in the disappearance warrant further scrutiny. Given the gravity of such accusations, an independent and comprehensive investigation, possibly with international oversight, would be necessary to ascertain the depth of government complicity and ensure accountability and justice.

What is Government's Interest in Silencing Torture Witnesses, is it a Foundation for Enforced Disappearances?

The eradication of witnesses, particularly those who have undergone torture or have first-hand accounts of state-inflicted injustices, can be a strategic move for governments seeking to suppress evidence of their wrongdoing. Below are arguments to support the proposition that a government might have a vested interest in causing the enforced disappearance of such witnesses:

Erosion of Credible Evidence: Witnesses to torture, especially victims, are the most potent sources of credible evidence. Their firsthand accounts and physical scars can be compelling proof. Silencing them helps a government under scrutiny avoid the spotlight, thereby weakening the evidence against them.

Preventing International Sanctions: Countries that are signatories to international human rights treaties could face severe sanctions if found guilty of gross human rights violations. Getting rid of evidence and witnesses can be seen as a way to escape these repercussions.

Maintaining a Favorable Public Image: Reputation is everything. If tales of torture and abuse emerge, the public image of the ruling government can be seriously tainted, both nationally and internationally. By silencing witnesses, the government can control the narrative and maintain an image of stability and righteousness.

Deterrence for Other Potential Whistle blowers: The enforced disappearance of a few can send a clear message to many. It serves as a chilling deterrent for other potential whistle blowers or victims from coming forward with their stories.

Strengthening Autocratic Rule: Authoritarian governments thrive on fear. By making examples out of a few, they can instill fear in the masses, ensuring a subdued and compliant population, less likely to challenge the status quo.

Shielding Perpetrators: Removing witnesses ensures that those responsible for the torture, whether they are low-ranking officers or high-ranking officials, are shielded from investigations and potential prosecution.

The Nexus with the Enforced Disappearance of the Family:
Given the family's experience, their enforced disappearance can be perceived as more than a tragic coincidence. If they had been exposed to or bore witness to acts of torture, their sudden and inexplicable vanishing could be seen in the context of the government's broader strategy to eliminate damning evidence.

Conclusion:
Enforced disappearances, especially of witnesses or victims of torture, strike at the heart of justice, transparency, and accountability. The incidents described make a compelling case for an international criminal investigation into human rights abuses, suggesting the potential complicity of key government figures and agencies. The obstruction of inquiries into reported torture offenses by a government minister represents a grievous violation of both human rights and the overriding principles of international law, known as jus cogens norms. This act, in essence, normalizes the use of torture within Sweden. The emphasis on international standards and the invocation of "jus cogens" amplify the severity of the government's alleged actions and the paramount importance of upholding human rights. Given the magnitude of these accusations, it is paramount to emphasize the need for concrete evidence and a rigorous, unbiased investigation. Claims of a government's comprehensive involvement in such breaches demand solid proof to ensure their credibility and validity.

🔴 Urgent Support Needed! 🔴

Help us champion human rights in Sweden! We're raising funds to appoint a dedicated human rights lawyer to combat violations of international law. By contributing, you'll be:

✅ Defending the voiceless victims of torture.
✅ Upholding the pillars of justice and transparency.
✅ Ensuring that Sweden respects and adheres to international legal standards.

Join us in this vital mission. Together, we can make a difference and ensure a just future for all in Sweden! 💪🌍 #StandForJustice #HumanRightsForAll

Message to prosecutor’s office at the International Criminal Court (ICC):

On August 8, 2022, the whistleblower's family, already under distress, faced retaliation from the government when their car was extorted under threats at their private residence. This mirrors the extortion situation that initiated this case in 2010, involving a criminal motorcycle gang where violence was used for the purpose of extorting with a vehicle. This crime was intentionally used by the state to enforce the disappearance of family members on November 15, 2022. This was influenced by the Swedish security police's involvement in the social services' investigation and child welfare reports, events that occurred weeks before the government's decision on December 1, 2022. After the Justice Minister's Ju2022/02354 decision, a police report for case no. 0150-K2541-23 was filed, addressing allegations of torture and enforced disappearance associated with Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer. On July 27, 2023, for the case AMR-3851-23, the Prosecutor General directed the Swedish Parliament's Committee on the Constitution to lead the investigation. This decision entrusts only Swedish politicians at the government and parliamentary levels with the oversight of criminal investigations concerning murder and torture victims. Such a procedure not only breaches the Swedish constitution but also directly violates Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which safeguards the right to life and mandates thorough investigations into deaths. Additionally, this stance conflicts with Article 3 of the convention and the overarching erga omnes obligation under the Convention against Torture. The government refuses to investigate systematic torture crimes involving the Chancellor of Justice's exercise of authority, making this a matter for the International Criminal Court. Evidence and documentation of case are available for the International Criminal Court's prosecutor's office, and contact details are provided at the bottom of the web page.

Message to criminal investigative authorities in the USA:

In Sweden, intentional torture crimes have been committed against a complainant, an American citizen residing in Ohio, USA. His legal representative faced threats involving automatic weapons at the Borås District Court in case no. T56-14, among other cases. Evidence suggests the Swedish state's involvement in a criminal conspiracy, systematic money laundering, murder and torture. Their objective was to undermine American interests and subject an American citizen to torture, facilitated by a data breach. This illicit activity took place on American soil with the intention of criminalizing an American citizen. Alarmingly, the Swedish Economic Crime Authority's prosecutor has been involved in systematic money laundering crimes, sanctioned by the government, for over a decade. During this period, there was a state conspiracy in which companies were hijacked under armed threats. The prosecutor utilized court processes in Borås District Court for the purpose of hijacking, targeting criminal profits from business operations. This involved the complicity of a judge and other legal authorities in the criminal plan. The money laundering crimes in this case amount to over 25 million USD. This does not include the economic value and loss of business opportunities in the USA market, which was possible solely due to the documented weapon threats targeting business operators and legal representatives. The prosecutor responsible for threats involving automatic weapons communicated to legal representatives in judicial processes, and who is involved in company hijackings, has mentioned the actors who are accomplices in the criminal plan during a radio interview. This is presented in video presentation number 4, starting at 5:15. Evidence and documentation are available for American crime investigation authorities, and contact details are provided at the bottom of the web page.

The Swedish state's violation of the rule of law through the verdict in case no. T3106-18 at Borås District Court due to State threats with weapon presented in courtroom.

A verbatim transcript is available where The Tax Authority official testifies in court regarding state-sanctioned threats with weapons and extortion.

Family and Children Threatened and Assaulted with Knife in Private Home: Serious Abuses of Legal Processes in Borås District Court Cases B310-12 and T3106-18 with Involvement of Investigative Authorities in the Abuses.

Analysis of the judgement in case no. T3106-18

Click here for an brief analysis of the judgement in case no. T3106-18 in Borås District Court.

Judgement Restrictions and Rule of Law: Analyzing Hilmarsson's Testimony on Automatic Weapon Threats.

On which pages of the judgment in case no. T3106-18 in Borås District Court are Kjell's weapon threats mentioned and where in the video presentation are these events documented?

What does the judgement mention about investigation authorities intentionally manipulating evidence in crime investigations?

What type of evidence has Mr. Rivinoja submitted to court when alleging that investigative authorities have deliberately tampered with evidence in criminal probes, with the intent to facilitate legal abuses and obstruct inquiries into repeated knife attacks?

Is it possible to verify the information on documents presented on the website to ensure its accuracy?

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

What is the purpose of this website?

Is it possible to verify the information on documents presented on the website to ensure its accuracy?

Is it possible to contact you and ask questions about the reported cases?

What types of crimes in the legal processes have victims of torture been exposed to in Sweden?

How is Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer implicated in the enforced disappearance of a mother and children on November 15, 2022, related to the government's decision on December 1, 2022?

What is Government's Interest in Silencing Torture Witnesses, is it a Foundation for Enforced Disappearances?

How is the Swedish government involved in and contributing to torture?

Why has the government made a decision where the Chancellor of Justice is reported for misconduct in office, where the offense constitutes torture?

What is the relationship between the Chancellor of Justice and the government?

Why was the Chancellor of Justice reported to the Prosecutor's Office for complicity in torture while in office, after which the government made a decision in case Ju2022/02354?

In what manner has the Chancellor of Justice and Justice minister Gunnar Strömmer been involved in crimes involve torture?

How does the judgment of Borås District Court in case number T3106-18 violate the principle of the rule of law, and how does the judgment constitute torture for the individuals concerned?

Meet the victims of torture

Mr Rivinoja

Boy 13 years old

Girl 8 years old

Girl 5 years old

Message to prosecutor’s office at the International Criminal Court (ICC):

Message to criminal investigative authorities in the USA:

Responsible publisher and contact information

Address

Email

Phone

Project gofund.me